Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity :: Multiculturalism Cultural Culture Politics Essays

Non-Dominant Voices on residual of opinion and DiversityChapter one of Multiculturalism from the Margins Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity is Social Movework forcets and the regime of Difference by Cheryl Zarlenga Kerchis and Iris Marion Young. This chapter examines the idea of assimilation versus acceptance of convocation departures. The chapter begins by explaining the historical acceptance of assimilation especially in the coupled States with its ideals of the American melting pot. However, as Kerchis and Young explained each accessible ag aggroup evolved and eventually began to embrace the idea of a political sympathies of difference. Although assimilation is shut away often part of policy and social practice in the unite States, Kerchis and Young point out that this idea oppresses the socially disadvantaged group in three separate ways. First, assimilation oppresses socially disadvantaged groups because in trying to assimilate the socially disadvantaged g roup is always play a game of catch up. Secondly, assimilation suggests that one culture is the proficient one. Lastly, members of the socially disadvantaged group can end up popular opinion abnormal or deviant. On the other hand, the idea of politics of difference allows members of an oppressed group to celebrate and be proud of their identity(Harris, 1995, p.11). Also, the politics of difference allows the disadvantaged social groups to accept their differences and not try and sic their culture to the more than dominant culture. Therefore, there is not a feel of a correct culture versus a less desirable one. government activity of difference also allows society to view the dominant culture in a critical light, which can lead to necessary changes. Lastly, politics of difference embraces the concept of individualism, which American society has always held in high esteem.The origin suggests that Our nation should strive for social justice in its political and social instituti ons. (Harris, 1995, p. 16). Just an informal review of the political or judicial foundation reveals that social justice has not been accomplished. Most Americans agree that the justice organization strongly favors the dominant culture. American politicians are certainly not a diverse group of people. In education, the changes have been more strident. I flow in a school district that is primarily Hispanic. More and more administrators who are Hispanic are being hired. However, primarily white men hold the top district positions. The author next discusses the disadvantage women of nipper bearing years face in the work force. This is certainly an produce that I have experienced personally.