Border and Coastal Security (Criminal Justice) Essay Example for Free

Border and Coastal Security (Criminal Justice) assayHardened Border Paradox and Open Border Paradox. The Hardened Border Paradox refers to the situation when tougher call up controls fail to achieve their objective throw in illegal migrants and smuggling. Instead, it is argued, these tougher controls create an atmosphere ripe for spread of wrong activity. Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, Senior Fellow in National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, in his scripted testimony before a hearing of the Committee on Foreign Relations, unify States Senate noted that Draconian measures to police the bank invariably provide incentives for informal arrangements and criminal conspiracies to overcome cross-border barriers to commerce and labor movements. on that point appears an industry for helping illegal migrants, whereas the cooperation of law enforcement bodies is reduced when one side unilaterally pursues strict policies. The border becomes more chaotic, and tough regula tion creates a demand for those who are in the business of put the illegal crossings (Kirkpatrick, 2004). This paradox can be resolved by combating illegal groupings and promoting cooperation at the border amidst authorities on both sides.The Open Border Paradox includes the need to combat the movement of terrorists and smugglers crossways open borders without damaging the free advert of goods and services that benefits the economies of both nations. This paradox exists, for example, on the US-Canadian border where the flow of goods and services is in dependence on anti-terrorist measures.To overcome this paradox, authorities from both sides can create particular projects targeting terrorists without jeopardizing trade flows. Kirkpatrick in his testimony points out the example of a bi-national Integrated Border Enforcement Team (IBET) created on the US-Canadian border to overcome smuggling in 1996.Is it cost effective to spend millions and millions of dollars in an effort to st op a handfull of people who are bound to squeeze the United States?Counteracting the bunch of people bound to terrorize the United States is worth millions of dollars and perhaps even more. This number is commensurate with the devastating impact September eleventh and other events had on the development of the American economy and national security. Efforts to combat terrorism within the United States are also costly.The negative effect of terrorist activities on the sparing activities of Americans can hardly be overrated. terrorism poses a risk to the United States and all of its business. Foreign partners contemplating a deal with US companies will be more reluctant to do so if they perceive the state as being in day-and-night danger of an external attack. This means loss in indirect costs from dangers to the national security, with the effect same to that political instability in developing nations has on their ability to attract and retain direct international investment.Th e costs of failing to keep the terrorists out are therefore serious issues that have to be turn to in order to prevent the possible danger to the economy. In this way, these efforts are similar to risk vigilance in business. The risk precludeed may never materialize, and all the costs seem to have sunk in vain however, if the risk did materialize, the impact on business would have been much greater.Speaking of the need to avert a terrorist attack through anti-terrorism campaigns, one need not forget that it is not moreover economic prosperity that is at stake. The negative impact on the quality of lives of Americans from September 11th attacks cannot be thrifty in dollars alone, for here one must factor in the pain, the grief, and the fear that affected even those who only saw the attacks on TV. The government has to deliver public goods to the people, and national security is one of them. Therefore, spending expectant sums on anti-terrorist measures is a sound idea as long as helps to prevent the terrorists effectively from acquiring into the country and perpetrating their crimes.