Breach Of Confidentiality: The Legal Implications When You Are Seeking :: essays research papers

wear out of Confidentiality The Legal Implications When You Are Seeking TherapyAbnormal Psychology 204 November 2, 1996Breach of Confidentiality The legal Implications when You argon seeking Therapy I.The need for confidentiality in therapy A. Establish self-assurance B. A patients billof even ups Thesis The duty to find fault with has created an ethical predicament forpsychological professionals. II. Therapists face a moral problem B.Requirement by law to breach confidentiality C. Exceptions for breachingconfidentiality D. Prediction of violence E. Impact on knob I. The futureoutlook for therapy A. Conflicting views between the legal and psychologicalprofessions mint are afraid to admit to themselves and others that they need to help toresolve their psychological problems. This is due to the social stigma whichsociety attaches to people, when they seek assistance from a mental healthprofessional. Consequently it is very difficult for any someone to establish atrusting relat ionship with their therapist, because they fear, that thetherapist might collapse their most personal information and emotions to others.Health professionals therefore created the patients bill of rights to unlesst inconfidence between clients and therapists. The patient has a right to every regard of privacy concerning his own medical wangle program. Casediscussion, consultation, examination, and treatment are confidential and shouldbe conducted discreetly. Those not directly involved in his care must have thepermission of the patient to be present. The patient has the right to expectthat all communications and records pertaining to his care should be treated asconfidential. ( Edge, 63 ) This bill of rights enables clients to disclose allpersonal information without fears. To full confide in the therapist isessential to the success of the therapy. On the other hand, the therapist islegally obliged to breach this trust when necessary. The duty to warn hascreated an ethical dilem ma for psychological professionals. The duty to warn isbased on a court ruling in 1974. Tatiana Tarasoff was come outed by Prosenjit Poddar.Prior to the cleanup spot Poddar had told his therapist that he would kill Tatianaupon her return from Brazil. The psychologist tried to have Poddar committed,but since the psychiatrist overseeing this case failed to take action, Poddarwas never committed nor was Tarasoff warned about Poddars intentions to kill her.This failure resulted in Tatianas death. The Supreme Court therefore ruled thatthe psychologist had a duty to warn people which could possibly become harmed (Bourne, 195-196 ). This policy, to warn threaten people, insures thattherapists must breach there confidentiality for specific reasons only. Thesefew exceptions are legal injury Principle"When the practitioner can foresee a danger to an separate who